115% reduced physical reflect...
|
I 115% reduced physical reflect damage taken and STILL taking damage from physical reflection how come? I have Slayer ascendancy 50%, soul of Yougul 25%, sybil's lament 40% together 115% and taking damage. Don't get it.
Last bumped27 нояб. 2017 г., 05:38:54
|
|
|
Do you have elemental damage?
IGN: Arlianth
Check out my LA build: 1782214 |
|
|
Also: do you have Increased Damage Taken, such as Abyssus?
|
|
|
Is your sybil's in the proper ring slot?
|
|
|
Might be a cap on it too. Most defenses either have diminishing returns or have a cap.
|
|
"Shouldn't be! :) Way at the bottom (mechanical questions thread, loading will take a while): Q: If you use Fortify, Sibyl's lament, and the Headsman passive from Slayer, do you achieve 100% reduced damage from physical reflect? Or does fortify only reduces 20% of the 20% left after sibyl's and Headsman. A: Those are all reduced modifiers to damage taken, they stack additively. This totals 100% reduced physical reflected damage taken (which will still be additive with other reduced or increased modifiers to damage taken, such as Shock). Последняя редакция: Vipermagi#0984. Время: 24 нояб. 2017 г., 22:20:22
|
|
|
I have elemental damage. But im taking damage from physical reflection mob. Yes ring is in right spot. I have abbysus but it shouldn't matter if reflection is over 100% I shouldn't get any reflected damage. But damage is very small but it triger immortal call with lv. 4 cast on damage. At least I don't die on critical hits.
Последняя редакция: Kastmar#4974. Время: 24 нояб. 2017 г., 22:30:13
|
|
" How should it not matter? Simple math says it does: 115-(45+/-5)<100 |
|
" That's not how increased and reduced damage taken works. They're additive with each other. You may have 115% reduced reflected damage taken, but that's additive with abyssus's increased physical damage taken. So really, you have 65-75% reduced physical reflect damage taken depending on your abyssus roll. Последняя редакция: Shppy#6163. Время: 24 нояб. 2017 г., 23:19:34
|
|
" What the hell are you blabbing on about now. You're making no sense. If you can reach 100% mitigation, there is functionally no cap. |
|
