115% reduced physical reflect...

"
Vipermagi написал:
"
CaptainWARLORD написал:
Nowhere in that statement is said that there is no cap. [..] This does not suggest a cap of any kind.

What the hell are you blabbing on about now. You're making no sense.

If you can reach 100% mitigation, there is functionally no cap.


he actually is making sense, and is correct. you can fundamentally reach 100% mitigation by adding the totals but it doesn't mean you can "reach" (as in have) 100% mitigation. those are two separate things.

i don't think there is a cap, i think you can actually obtain 100% mitigation, but just saying that he does make sense.
Последняя редакция: xMustard#3403. Время: 25 нояб. 2017 г., 07:59:42
Sorry for bringing up the whole "there might be a cap" thing. It was just a suggestion. The case is clear now... he wasn't taking into account a effect from his helm.
Последняя редакция: Shagsbeard#3964. Время: 25 нояб. 2017 г., 08:08:31
"
xMustard написал:
he actually is making sense, and is correct. you can fundamentally reach 100% mitigation by adding the totals but it doesn't mean you can "reach" (as in have) 100% mitigation. those are two separate things.

Because Mark would just ignore that altogether right, while trying to accurately explain how the game works. No, that makes sense.
Thank you all. I'm actually fine even with abyssus. I was just curious how come I still taking damage. Now I know. Thanks.
Just btw, theoretical maximum for reduced reflected damage taken is 135% for physical damage and 145% for elemental damage. You can use fortify or other effects on top of that to be immune to reflect even with items like abyssus or self-cursed vulnerability (or the Berserker ascendency node, though you wouldn't have the Slayer one against reflect in that case).

Пожаловаться на запись форума

Пожаловаться на учетную запись:

Тип жалобы

Дополнительная информация