Hillary Clinton

"

ScrotieMcB написал:

You think Adams is wrong about people having persistent character? Well, he's not. And if you think you can disprove that with "but but people behave differently when they're being watched," sorry, you can't. That just means people aren't incredibly stupid.

My post isn't any more of a proof than Adams' original was. The blog post wasn't offered as a proof, rather as an Occaminc reasoning exercise to lead us to 'most likely', not 'true'. I happen to think he over applied the Razor though. I also don't deny that generally, people have persistent character (especially by Comey's age), just that they violate it under certain conditions, usually social ones.

So according to this former Republican State Department official, the Podesta hacks weren't the Russians... they were his buddies within US intelligence.

Very hard to believe, but... isn't he basically confessing to a crime?

Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton are in a bar.

Donald leans over, and With A smile on his face, says, "The media is really
tearing you apart for That Scandal."

Hillary: "You mean my lying about Benghazi?"

Trump: "No, the other one."

Hillary: "You mean the massive voter fraud?"

Trump: "No, the other one."

Hillary: "You mean the military not getting their
votes counted?"

Trump: "No, the other one."

Hillary: "Using my secret private server with
classified material to Hide my Activities?"

Trump: "No, the other one."

Hillary: "The NSA monitoring our phone calls, emails
and everything Else?"

Trump: "No, the other one."

Hillary: "Using the Clinton Foundation as a cover
for tax evasion, Hiring Cronies, And taking bribes from foreign countries?

Trump: "No, the other one."

Hillary: "You mean the drones being operated in our
own country without The Benefit of the law?"

Trump: "No, the other one."

Hillary: "Giving 123 Technologies $300 Million, and
right afterward it Declared Bankruptcy and was sold to the Chinese?"

Trump: "No, the other one."

Hillary: "You mean arming the Muslim Brotherhood and
hiring them in the White House?"

Trump: "No, the other one."

Hillary: "Whitewater, Watergate committee, Vince
Foster, commodity Deals?"

Trump: "No the other one:"

Hillary: "The funding of neoNazis in the Ukraine
that led to the toppling of the democratically elected president and to the
biggest crisis that country has had since WWII ?"

Trump: "No the other one:"

Hillary: "Turning Libya into chaos?"

Trump: "No the other one:"

Hillary: "Being the mastermind of the so-called
"Arab Spring" that only brought chaos, death and destruction to the
Middle East and North Africa ?

Trump: "No the other one:"

Hillary: "Leaving four Americans to die in Benghazi
and go to sleep?

Trump: "No the other one:"

Hillary: "Trashing Mubarak, one of our few Muslim
friends?"

Trump: "No the other one:"

Hillary: "Encouraging and supporting the
Palestinians in the destruction of Israel ?"

Trump: "No the other one:"

Hillary: "The funding and arming of terrorists in
Syria, the destruction and destabilization of that nation, giving the order to
our lapdogs in Turkey and Saudi Arabia to give sarin gas to the
"moderate" terrorists in Syria that they eventually used on
civilians, and framed Assad, and had it not been for the Russians and Putin, we
would have used that as a pretext to invade Syria, put a puppet in power, steal
their natural resources, and leave that country in total chaos, just like we
did with Libya?

Trump: "No the other one:"

Hillary: "The creation of the biggest refugees
crisis since WWII

Trump: "No the other one:"

Hillary: "Leaving Iraq in chaos? "

Trump: "No, the other one."

Hillary: "The DOJ spying on the press?"

Trump: "No, the other one."

Hillary: "You mean HHS Secretary Sibelius shaking
down health insurance Executives?"

Trump: "No, the other one."

Hillary: "Giving our cronies in SOLYNDRA $500
MILLION DOLLARS and 3 Months Later they declared bankruptcy and then the
Chinese bought it?"

Trump: "No, the other one."

Hillary: "The NSA monitoring citizens' ?"

Trump: "No, the other one."

Hillary: "The State Department interfering with an
Inspector General Investigation on departmental sexual misconduct?"

Trump: "No, the other one."

Hillary: "Me, The IRS, Clapper and Holder all lying
to Congress?"

Trump: "No, the other one."

Hillary: "Threats to all of Bill's former mistresses
to keep them quiet"

Trump: "No, the other one."

Hillary: "You mean sending classified emails using
my personal email server while secretary of state?"

Trump: "No, the other one."

Hillary: "You mean the thousands of anti-Bernie
Sanders emails from the Democratic National Committee?"

Trump: "No, the other one."

Hillary: "I give up! ... Oh wait, I think I've got
it! When I stole the White House furniture, silverware, when Bill left
Office?"

Trump: "THAT'S IT! I almost forgot about that
one".

=^[.]^=

"

ScrotieMcB написал:

So according to this former Republican State Department official, the Podesta hacks weren't the Russians... they were his buddies within US intelligence.

Very hard to believe, but... isn't he basically confessing to a crime?

If the Clinton/current administration isn't as corrupt and nefarious as all the leaks seem to indicate, than I would agree that it wouldn't make sense for a lot of agents to do something so drastic. Political motivation alone might get a few people, but not a large portion of them.

If the current administration/Clinton ARE as corrupt as the leaks seem to indicate, then it makes perfect sense that agents who have dedicated a large chunk of their lives to fighting crime would say enough is enough and do what they can to prevent things from getting worse.

There's bound to be some moles within Hillary's own campaign (and likely Trump's) as well.

"

DalaiLama написал:

"

ScrotieMcB написал:

So according to this former Republican State Department official, the Podesta hacks weren't the Russians... they were his buddies within US intelligence.

Very hard to believe, but... isn't he basically confessing to a crime?

If the Clinton/current administration isn't as corrupt and nefarious as all the leaks seem to indicate, than I would agree that it wouldn't make sense for a lot of agents to do something so drastic. Political motivation alone might get a few people, but not a large portion of them.

If the current administration/Clinton ARE as corrupt as the leaks seem to indicate, then it makes perfect sense that agents who have dedicated a large chunk of their lives to fighting crime would say enough is enough and do what they can to prevent things from getting worse.

There's bound to be some moles within Hillary's own campaign (and likely Trump's) as well.

I'd take the NSA over George Soros' electronic voting machines any day. =^[.]^=

"

ScrotieMcB написал:

So according to this former Republican State Department official, the Podesta hacks weren't the Russians... they were his buddies within US intelligence.

Very hard to believe, but... isn't he basically confessing to a crime?

He may have just jumped the shark.

"

Raycheetah написал:

Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton are in a bar.
...

=^[.]^=

much truth.

as a european i don't follow the american elections much but what i can say is that it should be in the european interest to prevent clinton. we would be the battlefield for a war with russia which would likely follow.
sadly the european elites want clinton badly and so all european media runs full propaganda mode in her favour.

if you can choose a clown or a professional killer to come after you i would always choose the clown. i read that reagan was nearly as bad as a candidate for presidency as trump.

Who's laughing, now? =^[.]^=

"

vio написал:

"

Raycheetah написал:

Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton are in a bar.
...

=^[.]^=

much truth.

as a european i don't follow the american elections much but what i can say is that it should be in the european interest to prevent clinton. we would be the battlefield for a war with russia which would likely follow.
sadly the european elites want clinton badly and so all european media runs full propaganda mode in her favour.

if you can choose a clown or a professional killer to come after you i would always choose the clown. i read that reagan was nearly as bad as a candidate for presidency as trump.

=^[.]^=

when it comes to presidental elections i prefer the german election system where the public clearly can't elect the president. we can elect any party we want, we always get merkel.