RIP mapping

I'm a simple man. I just want to kill lots of monsters, as many as possible that can fit on the screen.

Hopefully they increase the inherent packsize/density for maps to balance around this.

This should in effect force people to play longer, making them play for the full duration of the league. (This is a good thing)

I hope everything goes as planned.

"

PrinceNiels написал:

OP is k inda right though..
Besides catching these pokemons there does not seem to be much incentive to play the league..

Good luck catching them. I'm sure you'll enjoy catching them like you enjoyed ID the two abyss socket unique or getting to 50 lich kills.

OP is right.

Reduced supply of currency should just raise its value and cause deflation,right?

I think that's kind of their whole point here.

As was pointed out, I’ve removed overly antagonistic comments. Apologies. I hope that GGG balances map density to having less sextants.

Just some food for thought, it might be a nerf for those that extensively stacked mf gear and shaped/sextanted (is that even a word ?) their atlas. For everyone else it is a buff.


For example the discrepancy between the income of those shaping the atlas and those who prefer running all the maps will now be smaller(It will still be there, just not on the ridicolous scale it was before). Which in turn will increase the relative wealth of those players making it easier for them to gear themselves by killing monsters to earn currency instead of of earning currency by trading/flipping.


Overall i'm happy, the closer the different styles to play the endgame are in efficiency, the more choices there actually are for players.

"

Bab4Yaga написал:

"

PrinceNiels написал:

OP is k inda right though..
Besides catching these pokemons there does not seem to be much incentive to play the league..

Good luck catching them. I'm sure you'll enjoy catching them like you enjoyed ID the two abyss socket unique or getting to 50 lich kills.

OP is right.

And people will still spam vaults/spider forest because there is no point farming any other map. And you can buy pokemons anyway so who cares about league mechanics. They are just making the same process more tedious, not to say there will be less map drops due to less efficient sextant usage and less density. I see selling achievements and currency/item flipping the best ways to make cash next league.

"

Blakwhysper написал:

Allllllllllllllll the salty whining!!!

Hopefully they balance map density to 5 sextant instead of 50 and a biscos.

Cause you know, if they balanced them to people not using sextant then those that block wouldn’t be able to see the ground, shoulder to shoulder mobs.

Using 50 sextants? Nevermind, I'm not even gonna bother. It's like explaining math to a monkey.

"

Blakwhysper написал:

Allllllllllllllll the salty whining!!!

Hopefully they balance map density to 5 sextant instead of 50 and a biscos.

Cause you know, if they balanced them to people not using sextant then those that block wouldn’t be able to see the ground, shoulder to shoulder mobs.

remember no more breach, and no sextant blocking so the mobs are going to be alot less mobs...


also also fixed the damage of the mobs

most of the people happy for this change didnt use 600 or 1k chaos per 100 maps most of them are broke newbies that just hate lol

"

Towlg написал:

No more having a profit while mapping. Sextants are murdered, Biscos are devastated.

Market manipulators are still getting best profit in the game, and now the last alternative is gone.

Also no Breach.

Will be worst league of all times. GGG will never see any support from me anymore.

I’m not sure anything in this post is accurate. Everything he says is dead, I never did and did just fine mapping and stockpiling currency.

Found a Bisco’s, sold it.
Ended the league with like 50 Masters sextant sitting around doing nothing after getting challenge.
Only ran random breaches as I found them.


Yet somehow had 70+ exalts to spare when I was done with league. It is almost like your statement might be.....wrong.

Like the one you're quoting? o.0