|
Love the game. Loathe the lab.
The idea that the lab is "optional endgame" baffles me when the ascendancy points are behind it.
The regular trials make me feel like I am playing Zelda while the uber trials.... Maybe we should put every level-up skill-point behind RNG gates just for fun.. Level up twice with one mob pack and then not again for 1000 maps.. Played hundreds of maps last league to still come one trial short of uber-lab (which I didn't want to actually play, but if it was available to me I would have to get the points and the challenge).
I will frequently play an entire act at a time clearing all of the area/side areas, but if I had to clear the whole act and kill the boss without ever leaving/dying I would frankly never play this game (and it is my favorite game). I get that it is partially mental/psychological on my part, but for a game with so much customization/choice it just feels...wrong.
At least let me save my progress... I feel compelled to clear every area/mob/chest/rock as I play this game, but when I do have to play lab for ascendancy I rush through start to finish and hate how long it took.
Set them free or rework.
Последняя редакция: Soviet_Russia#4258. Время: 7 мар. 2017 г., 15:54:31
|
|
"
Soviet_Russia написал:
Love the game. Loathe the lab.
The idea that the lab is "optional endgame" baffles me when the ascendancy points are behind it.
The regular trials make me feel like I am playing Zelda while the uber trials.... Maybe we should put every level-up skill-point behind RNG gates just for fun.. Level up twice with one mob pack and then not again for 1000 maps.. Played hundreds of maps last league to still come one trial short of uber-lab (which I didn't want to actually play, but if it was available to me I would have to get the points and the challenge).
I will frequently play an entire act at a time clearing all of the area/side areas, but if I had to clear the whole act and kill the boss without ever leaving/dying I would frankly never play this game (and it is my favorite game). I get that it is partially mental/psychological on my part, but for a game with so much customization/choice it just feels...wrong.
At least let me save my progress... I feel compelled to clear every area/mob/chest/rock as I play this game, but when I do have to play lab for ascendancy I rush through start to finish and hate how long it took.
Set them free or rework.
Thank you for sharing your opinion on the H&H labyrinth (horrible and hated). Number 715 on the list. Over 290 threads discussing labyrinth problems with over 710 posters in support
Over 430 threads discussing labyrinth problems with over 1040 posters in support (thread # 1702621) Thank you all! GGG will implement a different method for ascension in PoE2. Retired!
|
СообщениеTurtledove#40147 мар. 2017 г., 16:07:52
|
"
Soviet_Russia написал:
Love the game. Loathe the lab.
The idea that the lab is "optional endgame" baffles me when the ascendancy points are behind it.
The regular trials make me feel like I am playing Zelda while the uber trials.... Maybe we should put every level-up skill-point behind RNG gates just for fun.. Level up twice with one mob pack and then not again for 1000 maps.. Played hundreds of maps last league to still come one trial short of uber-lab (which I didn't want to actually play, but if it was available to me I would have to get the points and the challenge).
I will frequently play an entire act at a time clearing all of the area/side areas, but if I had to clear the whole act and kill the boss without ever leaving/dying I would frankly never play this game (and it is my favorite game). I get that it is partially mental/psychological on my part, but for a game with so much customization/choice it just feels...wrong.
At least let me save my progress... I feel compelled to clear every area/mob/chest/rock as I play this game, but when I do have to play lab for ascendancy I rush through start to finish and hate how long it took.
Set them free or rework.
Not gunna happen anytime soon. Most people are ok with the lab, and the devs have already stated that they don't care if some people don't like it. On the plus side for the crusaders, though, they did mention that they might make the lower level iterations shorter.
|
СообщениеXtorma#46067 мар. 2017 г., 17:03:39
|
"
Xtorma написал:
On the plus side for the crusaders, though, they did mention that they might make the lower level iterations shorter.
If you think that this change addresses even in the slightest our issue with this content you still havent understood shit about the goal of this thread and why we want a change. (and neither has GGG)
@Reporter do you have any insight (regarding the bird) or just trolling/bumping?
Inundated with cockroaches, I am
https://www.pathofexile.com/forum/view-thread/1609216 - labyrinth rework ideas/suggestions Последняя редакция: Regulator#4587. Время: 7 мар. 2017 г., 21:23:01
|
СообщениеRegulator#45877 мар. 2017 г., 21:22:43Участник Альфы
|
"
Regulator написал:
"
Xtorma написал:
On the plus side for the crusaders, though, they did mention that they might make the lower level iterations shorter.
If you think that this change addresses even in the slightest our issue with this content you still havent understood shit about the goal of this thread and why we want a change. (and neither has GGG)
@Reporter do you have any insight (regarding the bird) or just trolling/bumping?
don't care whether or not your crusade ever makes even 1 foot of progress. I am just here spreading the truth. I see you still play, and still run the lab...good for you :D.
|
СообщениеXtorma#46067 мар. 2017 г., 22:16:14
|
"
Regulator написал:
"
Xtorma написал:
On the plus side for the crusaders, though, they did mention that they might make the lower level iterations shorter.
If you think that this change addresses even in the slightest our issue with this content you still havent understood shit about the goal of this thread and why we want a change. (and neither has GGG)
As usual, lots of things to "fix" ....
You are not representative in anyway for any portion of the playerbase, therefore your "our" or "we" is meaningless, it's arrogant on top of being futile.
Get real.
And yes, it will likely address part of the problem for many player (I'm sure you are aware of what I am refering to but since you are kinda blind here : the fact that running multiple times the lab is at least somewhat of a chore for many), you like it or not.
SSF is not and will never be a standard for balance, it is not for people entitled to getting more without trading. Последняя редакция: Fruz#6137. Время: 8 мар. 2017 г., 01:10:56
|
СообщениеFruz#61378 мар. 2017 г., 00:27:27
|
|
People also run into cactus and do other dumb shit. Dosen't t make it a good idea
|
СообщениеZalhan2#19868 мар. 2017 г., 00:55:17
|
"
Fruz написал:
"
Regulator написал:
"
Xtorma написал:
On the plus side for the crusaders, though, they did mention that they might make the lower level iterations shorter.
If you think that this change addresses even in the slightest our issue with this content you still havent understood shit about the goal of this thread and why we want a change. (and neither has GGG)
As usual, lots of things to "fix" ....
You are not representative in anyway for any portion of the playerbase, therefore your "our" or "we" is meaningless, it's arrogant on top of being futile.
Get real.
And yes, it will likely address part of the problem for many player (I'm sure you are aware of what I am refering to but since you are kinda blind here : the fact that running multiple times the lab is at least somewhat of a chore for many), you like it or not.
Fruz, you have overstated your argument. Making it untrue. You've seen plenty of posts in this very thread that make your statement untrue.
Over 430 threads discussing labyrinth problems with over 1040 posters in support (thread # 1702621) Thank you all! GGG will implement a different method for ascension in PoE2. Retired!
|
СообщениеTurtledove#40148 мар. 2017 г., 07:44:10
|
|
Not in the slightest.
Agreeing on some point with somebody does not mean agreeing to be represented by that individual.
And he has been using that toxic and missplaced "our" ( and the others obviously ) from the start.
SSF is not and will never be a standard for balance, it is not for people entitled to getting more without trading.
|
СообщениеFruz#61378 мар. 2017 г., 08:03:48
|
"
Regulator написал:
"
Xtorma написал:
On the plus side for the crusaders, though, they did mention that they might make the lower level iterations shorter.
If you think that this change addresses even in the slightest our issue with this content you still havent understood shit about the goal of this thread and why we want a change. (and neither has GGG)
@Reporter do you have any insight (regarding the bird) or just trolling/bumping?
It was some random babble from a couple characters in global HC. I'm sure it was nothing more than that. But maybe not...
|
СообщениеУдалено8 мар. 2017 г., 09:48:44
|
