Hillary Clinton

Ye he built a safe space with that forum filter script, not very courageous tbh.

"

DalaiLama написал:

"

Xavderion написал:

[Removed by Support]

Nah. I have to give Jennik some credit. A) He is posting his honest feelings, and B) still going whether outnumbered or not - which takes some courage.

People do realize this is republican's echo chamber.

"

deathflower написал:

"

DalaiLama написал:

"

Xavderion написал:

[Removed by Support]

Nah. I have to give Jennik some credit. A) He is posting his honest feelings, and B) still going whether outnumbered or not - which takes some courage.

People do realize this is republican's echo chamber.

Eh. I think that's true to some extent; Dalai, Ray, and Xav seem very similar in outlook. I don't agree fully with them though. I think we should avoid circle-jerking when possible.

I identify as centrist, but I also believe that "center" has a factual, non-opinion definition: a law which exactly pays for itself. If you don't support laws which provide more benefit than they cost, I define that as right; if you support laws which cost more than the benefit they provide, I define that as left; it's possible to be simultaneously left on some issues and right on others (and no doubt I am somewhat, accidentally), but both are off the mark. In terms of popular opinion, most of the world is far left, and only a few (but significant) people form the pseudo- and fully-anarchic right.

"

deathflower написал:

"

DalaiLama написал:

"

Xavderion написал:

[Removed by Support]

Nah. I have to give Jennik some credit. A) He is posting his honest feelings, and B) still going whether outnumbered or not - which takes some courage.

People do realize this is republican's echo chamber.

considering that the loonie left is saying that to anything that isnt them, such accusation has lost most of of its worth (same for "far right", I swear, throwing such baseless accusations constantly does nothing but devalue such denomination and get people to trust the accusers less and less).

Feel free to break the echo if you see it though. Although these forums arent the best, I dont think they are as shitty as reddit is regarding freedom of speech... yet

[Removed by Support]. Unsurprisingly, a Trumper comes along and says "no u, lel."

Good job, Trumpy. Like many of your peers, you have mastered the art of projection. Wonderfully done. I look forward to seeing which of your many other failings you project onto someone else next (assuming someone quotes you again so I can see it).

Also, has anyone remotely worth listening to ever said "lel?" On the plus side, it means he's most likely a child. On the minus side, from looking at older Trumpers and modern conservatives in general, he's not likely to grow out of it. What a damn shame.

[Removed by Support]
Personally, I dont dislike you that much tbh. Not only do you bring laughs to the table by means of character comedy (mixed with tragedy, truly a master writer), I've also enjoyed playing you for 1 red for 1 damage on turn 1 in MTG for years

Fake News:

"

What cost Hillary Clinton the election? Well obviously it could not have had anything to do with her creepy, fake smile, her human-like warmth or the swamp of corruption and even treason that she has made for herself. It must be the Russians! And FAKE NEWS! In his latest FIREWALL, Bill Whittle picks apart this nonsense and places the blame squarely on the head of the sore loser responsible for her thrashing.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0jh8qDR9Zm4

=^[.]^=

If you think fake news exclusively favors your political opposition, then you're so partisan you've become blind to the fake news on your side. I could fill this page with links to liberal fake news, or I could fill it with links to conservative fake news.

This isn't new. Choosing your flavor of misinformation is a decades-long practice. Ever since FOX News and HuffPo became things, people have been choosing their own bias. We live in an echo-chamber click-bait news culture, regardless of your party affiliation.

Poison as food, and poison as antidote. The mainstream on both sides is rife with corruption, pointed towards a single end. The main difference between neoconservativism and neoliberalism is window dressing.

The solution is a free Internet where small, decentralized outlets can have the opportunity for viral spread. This, more than anything else, is what the current "fake news" movement is trying to prevent. Yes, sometimes the viral is false, but in those incidents I have faith other purveyors of information can debunk it. What we cannot allow is centralized oligopoly of information which can be leveraged to propagandize the people.

"

ScrotieMcB написал:

If you think fake news exclusively favors your political opposition, then you're so partisan you've become blind to the fake news on your side. I could fill this page with links to liberal fake news, or I could fill it with links to conservative fake news.

This isn't new. Choosing your flavor of misinformation is a decades-long practice. Ever since FOX News and HuffPo became things, people have been choosing their own bias. We live in an echo-chamber click-bait news culture, regardless of your party affiliation.

Poison as food, and poison as antidote. The mainstream on both sides is rife with corruption, pointed towards a single end. The main difference between neoconservativism and neoliberalism is window dressing.

The solution is a free Internet where small, decentralized outlets can have the opportunity for viral spread. This, more than anything else, is what the current "fake news" movement is trying to prevent. Yes, sometimes the viral is false, but in those incidents I have faith other purveyors of information can debunk it. What we cannot allow is centralized oligopoly of information which can be leveraged to propagandize the people.

Geez, Scrotie. Lighten up. The Left, projecting again, started the current hysteria. =0[.]o=

the whole fake news shit is utterly hilarious

'fake news' has been a staple of the internet as long as Ive been on it (and I have been on it for a quite long time).

in fact, it's been around far before the internet as yellow journalism and yellow tabloids are established terms. but people somehow know better than to trust yellow ass papers.

back in the day, people who used the internet were savvy enough to be able to separate the bullshit from the real. and thats rule #1 of internet. now- not so much anymore. instead of reading and doing fact checking, people instead take it for face-value and just repost/retweet or post it to their friends. because hey- 'muh time is not worth checking facts and article shoudlve done that for me'. well, then you get what you deserve bruh. the internet is not a safe space, in fact it would make all grifters from o'henry's stories hang their head in shame of how insignificant their grifts were.
but its a great space for getting all your information from many different sources viewpoints and sides. you can construct a much better picture than any biased media can or ever will, from information from internet. it'll just take a large amount of time and effort.

but anyway, the only reason fake news is decried now because SUDDENLY media/propaganda/government understood how much power internet-created 'stories' possess and how a 'fake story' can go super viral and damage their reputation. its the age old story of shit being ok as long as it didnt touch them.

of course, there is hypocrisy here as I dont remember cnn or fox news or any other biased politics-influenced station apologizing or condemning all the fabricated stories they were exposed of doing.