Off Topic - ALL HAIL PRESIDENT TRUMP - Форум

Papa D? lmao He's a convicted felon.	Сообщение Удалено 22 янв. 2019 г., 19:12:47
" The_Reporter написал: Papa D? lmao He's a convicted felon. Yeah, they really got him for Russian collusion. Oh wait, they didn't. 12 days in jail for being a naughty boy lmao. GGG banning all political discussion shortly after getting acquired by China is a weird coincidence.	Сообщение Xavderion#3432 22 янв. 2019 г., 19:31:15 Цитировать это сообщение
" Xavderion написал: " The_Reporter написал: Papa D? lmao He's a convicted felon. Yeah, they really got him for Russian collusion. Oh wait, they didn't. 12 days in jail for being a naughty boy lmao. Isn't the actual, statutory penalty for collusion... Nada? Zip? I'm still not sure which actual law or laws are presumed to have been broken in that regard. Nobody who might even remotely be taken seriously is using the word "treason," because, well... Y'all can look up the legal definition of treason for yourselves. It all plays better as agitprop than it would in an actual court of law, which is why Mueller et al haven't moved to prosecute anyone in two years on charges of "collusion." More political capital in bloviating over this farce than in actually going to the mats with it and having all that evidence against Trump's accusers come out... Which it will, regardless, when Mueller is finished digging his own grave. =^[.]^= =^[.]^= basic (happy/amused) cheetahmoticon: Whiskers/eye/tear-streak/nose/tear-streak/eye/ whiskers =@[.]@= boggled / =>[.]<= annoyed or angry / ='[.]'= concerned / =0[.]o= confuzzled / =-[.]-= sad or sleepy / =[.]= dazzled / =^[.]~= wink / =~[.]^= naughty wink / =9[.]9= rolleyes #FourYearLie	Сообщение Raycheetah#7060 22 янв. 2019 г., 21:40:33 Участник Альфы Цитировать это сообщение
You kids should read the court documents. He was charged with lying to the FBI about illegal contact with Kremlin operatives. He plea-dealed his way down to just that one charge because of his cooperation providing the prosecutors with information on co-conspirators Also, Ray - You'll never see any of them charged with "collusion", because it isn't a term used in criminal indictments. It will be conspiracy to defraud the US	Сообщение Удалено 22 янв. 2019 г., 21:50:51
" The_Reporter написал: He plea-dealed his way down to just that one charge because of his cooperation providing the prosecutors with information on co-conspirators Straight from the sentencing memo: "The defendant did not provide “substantial assistance,” and much of the information provided by the defendant came only after the government confronted him with his own emails, text messages, internet search history, and other information it had obtained via search warrants and subpoenas well after the defendant’s FBI interview as the government continued its investigation." I know you have to parrot your talking points so it's not a big deal. A job is a job. GGG banning all political discussion shortly after getting acquired by China is a weird coincidence.	Сообщение Xavderion#3432 22 янв. 2019 г., 22:59:34 Цитировать это сообщение
An Impeachment Watch Special Bulletin: https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2019/01/22/here-we-go-impeachment-chairman-jerry-nadler-sends-demand-letter-to-aag-matt-whitaker/#more-159172 Mark your calendars, folks! The House Judiciary Committee is gonna grill President Donald J. Trump's former legal counsel and jailbird Michael Cohen, on Thursday, February 7th. " It should be noted Mr. Cohen is being represented at the committee hearing by DNC operative Lanny Davis. However, Mr. Lanny Davis is not being paid by Mr. Cohen; he is being paid by democrat groups supporting the ‘resistance’ strategy. " The very next day, Friday February 8th, Nadler has scheduled the DOJ to appear for his first round approach in the legislative trident. This is all being done by a well-crafted design. Toward that end, today Chairman Jerry Nadler sends an anticipatory demand letter (full pdf below) to Acting AG Matthew Whitaker telling him the committee will not respect any claims of executive privilege between the DOJ and the White House. Washington, D.C. –Today, House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerrold Nadler (D-NY) sent a letter to Acting Attorney General Matthew Whitaker outlining a list of prepared questions concerning communications between the Mr. Whitaker and President Trump in advance of the February 8th House Judiciary Committee hearing. In the letter, Chairman Nadler makes clear that the Committee expects direct answers to their questions, and “will not accept your declining to answer any question on the theory that the President may want to invoke his privileges in the future.” The prepared questions cover issues related to Mr. Whitaker’s appointment by President Trump to replace Jeff Sessions following his firing, Mr. Whitaker’s decision not to recuse himself from the Special Counsel investigation, and his oversight over the Special Counsel investigation, and the nature of his relationship with the President. (press release) " The attack angle the three-headed Cerberus (Cummings, Schiff and Nadler) will take becomes more clear as we review the demand questions from Nadler: President Trump fired former Attorney General Jeff Sessions November 7, 2018. On or before that date, did you have any communication with any White House official, including but not limited to President Trump, about the possibility of your appointment as Acting Attorney General? If so, when and with whom? Did any of those communications discuss the possibility of your recusal from oversight of the Special Counsel’s investigation? You announced your decision not to recuse yourself from the Special Counsel’s investigation on December 19, 2018. Did you consult with the White House about that decision, before or after it was announced? If so, with whom? My understanding is that you consulted with a four-person team of advisors for guidance on the question of your recusal. Who are these four individuals? Did any of them consult with the White House about your decision not recuse yourself from the Special Counsel’s investigation? Have you ever received a briefing on the status of the Special Counsel’s investigation? If so, have you communicated any information you learned in that briefing to any White House official, including but not limited to President Trump, or any member of President Trump’s private legal team? It has been reported that President Trump “lashed out” at you on at least two occasions: after Michael Cohen pleaded guilty on November 29, 2018, and after federal prosecutors identified President Trump as “Individual 1” in a court filing on December 8, 2018.[1] Did President Trump contact you after Michael Cohen pleaded guilty? What did he say? Did you take any action as a result of that conversation? Did President Trump contact you after he was identified as “Individual 1” in documents related to the criminal sentencing of Michael Cohen? What did he say? Did you take any action as a result of that conversation? In any of these conversations, did President Trump express concern, anger, or similar frustration with the actions of the Office of the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York? In any of these conversations, did President Trump discuss the possibility of firing or reassigning certain personnel who work for the Office of the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York? In any of these conversations, did the President discuss the recusal of Geoffrey Berman, the current U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York, from the Michael Cohen case and other matters related to the work of the Special Counsel? Former Attorney General Jeff Sessions tasked John Huber, the U.S. Attorney for the District of Utah, with reviewing a wide range of issues related to former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton. Have you ever received a briefing on the status of Mr. Huber’s work? If so, have you communicated any information you learned in such a briefing to any White House official, including but not limited to President Trump, or any member of President Trump’s private legal team? On January 17, 2018, BuzzFeed News reported that federal prosecutors have evidence, in the form of witness interviews and internal communications, suggesting that President Trump had directed Michael Cohen to lie to Congress. On January 18, the Special Counsel issued a rare statement describing some aspects of the BuzzFeed story as inaccurate. Did you have any communication with the White House about the BuzzFeed report or the decision of the Special Counsel’s office to issue its subsequent statement? If so, with whom? What was discussed? Still pinning their hopes on the discredited BuzzFeed story, I see, because I don't see any questions regarding substantive "high crimes or misdemeanors" in the initial questions. It's a fishing expedition, and I hope Acting AG Whitaker tells Torquemada &c where to stick it when they refuse to respect executive privilege. =^[.]^= =^[.]^= basic (happy/amused) cheetahmoticon: Whiskers/eye/tear-streak/nose/tear-streak/eye/ whiskers =@[.]@= boggled / =>[.]<= annoyed or angry / ='[.]'= concerned / =0[.]o= confuzzled / =-[.]-= sad or sleepy / =[.]= dazzled / =^[.]~= wink / =~[.]^= naughty wink / =9[.]9= rolleyes #FourYearLie	Сообщение Raycheetah#7060 22 янв. 2019 г., 23:51:34 Участник Альфы Цитировать это сообщение
Cohen was never Trump's legal counsel. He was a bagman and goon. Trump is a mobster. A career thug. All of the folks who worked around him are criminals. Open your eyes.	Сообщение Удалено 23 янв. 2019 г., 01:56:17
Orange man so bad, is not man. Orange monster no have right to attorney-client privilege. Orange monster have no rights. Kill orange monster! Orange monster bad! When Stephen Colbert was killed by HYDRA's Project Insight in 2014, the comedy world lost a hero. Since his life model decoy isn't up to the task, please do not mistake my performance as political discussion. I'm just doing what Steve would have wanted.	Сообщение ScrotieMcB#2697 23 янв. 2019 г., 02:58:10 Цитировать это сообщение
The salt and TDS in that "article" is through the roof. Keep it coming. I was curious and yep, he looks like a classic nu-male. No surprises there. GGG banning all political discussion shortly after getting acquired by China is a weird coincidence. Последняя редакция: Xavderion#3432. Время: 23 янв. 2019 г., 08:37:09	Сообщение Xavderion#3432 23 янв. 2019 г., 08:31:18 Цитировать это сообщение
" 鬼殺し написал: https://www.gizmodo.com.au/2019/01/president-trump-posts-altered-photos-to-facebook-and-instagram-that-make-him-look-thinner/ hahahahahaha you fat ugly fuck! That finger extension! What an insecure little man. Someone make fun of my wittle itty bitty hands, WAAAHAAAA! I'm too fat, should I exercise or stop eating junk food? I'm too entitled WAAAAHAAAA! The proper solution is to lie, make my finger picture longer and tummy picture skinny. There, now where's my pacifier? Over 430 threads discussing labyrinth problems with over 1040 posters in support (thread # 1702621) Thank you all! GGG will implement a different method for ascension in PoE2. Retired!	Сообщение Turtledove#4014 23 янв. 2019 г., 11:18:10 Цитировать это сообщение