[3.X] SPECTRAL SHIELD THROW DeadEye (100% phys and 90% ELE. 1,5-2M DPS REALISTIC GEAR non-crit!)
I am playing this build and i am currently lvl 85+ on BSC and it's quite fun.
Some little thing i don't like but in general it's pretty good! If you want to see how it goes here is my stream: Twitch.tv/enforcingem I stream late a night EST time. and During the day depending on my work schedule. I'm a French canadian but i do speak English. Will be happy to answer questions if able too. Thanks. 🆃🆆🅸🆃🅲🅷.🆃🆅/NForceTV (🆀🅲/🅴🅽 🆂🆃🆁🅴🅰🅼)
|
|
First off excuse me if its just an oversight, as i haven't played path in ages.
This is my first league in probably 3 years atleast, but im confused as to where exactly we are generating our endurance charges at for immortal call? I should also add that thus far im loving the build and feel pretty good about it thus far! Последняя редакция: gorrath101#1850. Время: 7 марта 2018 г., 22:45:57
|
|
" No worries mate, i already fixed Endurance Charges generation with Enduring Cry, will update PoB very soon! Overall i am not a big fan of immortal call at all, and since we have a lot of Evasion, it's mostly about evading hits entirely other than getting hit and proccing. https://www.twitch.tv/angry_roleplayer
All builds: http://www.angryroleplayer.com/path-of-exile-builds/ https://www.pathofexile.com/forum/view-thread/2143469 |
|
just got a quick question, why no one thinks about using brutality? its "more physical damage" and nowhere on it does it say melee so, it should support SST as it is a "projectile,attack" skill.
https://pathofexile.gamepedia.com/Brutality_Support I was thinking to just go phys and use: SST - FA - PPAD - Brutality - Maim - Pierce as per wiki pierce would still work giving the more damage to the skill too. YES I support the game, NO I don't agree with many GGG decisions Lab still sucks balls. I miss Zana already. Последняя редакция: Miazga#7204. Время: 8 марта 2018 г., 7:13:21
|
|
So far so good, haven't been having that much trouble on t13+ in terms of damage; and I'm still usign 5L so all in all there's hope. I've also gone for a block cap build using rumis
Последняя редакция: Bolentine#2393. Время: 8 марта 2018 г., 7:17:56
|
|
" Brutality = no elemental or chaos damage. Will not work with the build ) https://www.twitch.tv/angry_roleplayer
All builds: http://www.angryroleplayer.com/path-of-exile-builds/ https://www.pathofexile.com/forum/view-thread/2143469 |
|
I slotted faster attacks along with Ewar's and Gloomfang. It is pretty awesome when tailwind kicks in, and you start machinegunning mobs with SST and it chains all over the screen throwing shard projectiles everywhere.
|
|
" What do u think about going cold pen over cold to fire? I feel like damage on low resists mobs is more than fine, but it really becomes an issue on cold resists or overall chaos and elemental damage resistant mobs (specially bosses) Going for cold pen over cold to fire might be a more significant increase in clear speed |
|
" Faster Attacks is less damage than any of the gems i have in the 6l of the build. Why? First of all it just buffs attack speed, and even though you attack faster you are doing not as much damage as a solid 40% increased damage gem. Secondly = with enough attack speed on the tree and especially with tailwind up, attack speed is not really a problem. You need to hit harder to kill fat mobs. Hitting more often = depleting mana faster as well :) https://www.twitch.tv/angry_roleplayer
All builds: http://www.angryroleplayer.com/path-of-exile-builds/ https://www.pathofexile.com/forum/view-thread/2143469 |
|
" Cold Pen is not as good now. I would even say the glorious day of Pen are gone. It's a great boost if you have no other sources of damage buffs, but if you have a lot of massive dps gems like in our case, cold pen is not very effective. According to PoB, dropping Pen is 7-8% dps loss. Dropping any other gem is 18-35% dps loss. Just math here. https://www.twitch.tv/angry_roleplayer
All builds: http://www.angryroleplayer.com/path-of-exile-builds/ https://www.pathofexile.com/forum/view-thread/2143469 |
|