What games do you guys play other than POE?

"
Raycheetah#7060 написал:
"
tsunamikun#0433 написал:
stellaris, time to finally beat the unplugged origin


Love Stellaris (at least, the version I played some time back). Still waiting for the game to stabilize in a persistent paradigm. ='[.]'=



roll with the blows man, it will never happen ;)
I think they like to reinvent the whole think every 2 years or so. After understanding the current system i even kind of like it more than the one before. But lets see what they will do next
Current Build: Penance Brand
God build?! https://pobb.in/bO32dZtLjji5
"
tsunamikun#0433 написал:
"
Raycheetah#7060 написал:
"
tsunamikun#0433 написал:
stellaris, time to finally beat the unplugged origin


Love Stellaris (at least, the version I played some time back). Still waiting for the game to stabilize in a persistent paradigm. ='[.]'=



roll with the blows man, it will never happen ;)
I think they like to reinvent the whole think every 2 years or so. After understanding the current system i even kind of like it more than the one before. But lets see what they will do next


sorry to inject, but did they balance the battles/militaristic/domination goals at all? or is it still like CK3 in space? My first playthrough Stellaris was amazing due to setting and lore but the 'domination' path almost felt like unintended way to play the game.
"
AintCare#6513 написал:
"
tsunamikun#0433 написал:
"
Raycheetah#7060 написал:

Love Stellaris (at least, the version I played some time back). Still waiting for the game to stabilize in a persistent paradigm. ='[.]'=


roll with the blows man, it will never happen ;)
I think they like to reinvent the whole think every 2 years or so. After understanding the current system i even kind of like it more than the one before. But lets see what they will do next


sorry to inject, but did they balance the battles/militaristic/domination goals at all? or is it still like CK3 in space? My first playthrough Stellaris was amazing due to setting and lore but the 'domination' path almost felt like unintended way to play the game.


Currently i guess the become the crisis path(like transcendence win in Alpha centauri) is the intended way to go. Depending on the crisis it either meshes well with domination or not. But both of them are valid.

There is also the overlord method which works well in hand with a political domination/custodian win.
But it feels like they balanced stellaris more about fleet battles. They want you to battle, even on "peaceful" win paths. (like for example toppling the xenophobe party from an empire to make it more cooperative)

Current Build: Penance Brand
God build?! https://pobb.in/bO32dZtLjji5
"
tsunamikun#0433 написал:


Currently i guess the become the crisis path(like transcendence win in Alpha centauri) is the intended way to go. Depending on the crisis it either meshes well with domination or not. But both of them are valid.

There is also the overlord method which works well in hand with a political domination/custodian win.
But it feels like they balanced stellaris more about fleet battles. They want you to battle, even on "peaceful" win paths. (like for example toppling the xenophobe party from an empire to make it more cooperative)



i see, i guess mashing things up can make it more interesting. I'm just used to games like Civ where you can mass army and just push and push. Needing permission to attack someone or straight up inability to violate a post war peace treaty felt odd :P

Пожаловаться на запись форума

Пожаловаться на учетную запись:

Тип жалобы

Дополнительная информация