So, are there no more updates for this league?

As the title says....is this what we get to see for the next 3 months?

There might be some minor things but yeah you’ll have to wait till december

Nine months since initial drop, version 0.3, no swords. Gonna be in "early access" for a LONG time. ='[.]'=

I just hope they will fix Defy II support gem before this league is over.

My whole build can barely attack twice before i'm out of mana and the no mana consumption while surrounded is still bugged.

People want meaningfull endgame while i just want working support gems that do what they say.

"

Raycheetah#7060 написал:

Nine months since initial drop, version 0.3, no swords. Gonna be in "early access" for a LONG time. ='[.]'=

You don't have to use quotes. You can just say early access. That's what this is.

Like I'm sorry I completely understood the skepticism around the EA model but it has been over 12 years at this point and the EA funding and development model has produced some of the most successful and beloved titles of the last decade.

Baldur's Gate 3 was in EA for 3 years before going on to be one of the most critically acclaimed RPGs of all time; Hades was in EA for just under 2 years and is the uncontested gold standard for hack & slash action roguelikes; Factorio was in EA for almost 5 years and has quietly walked its way into history selling 3.5 million copies since going live; Rimworld spent 5 years in EA; Subnautica was in EA for over 3 years, Dead Cells, PUBG, Valheim...

Like I could go on there are at least another dozen titles on this list that spent 2 or more years in EA and then went on to massive success can we please stop pretending it's some kind of shady scam GGG is pulling on us?

"

Kerchunk#7797 написал:

"

Raycheetah#7060 написал:

Nine months since initial drop, version 0.3, no swords. Gonna be in "early access" for a LONG time. ='[.]'=

You don't have to use quotes. You can just say early access. That's what this is.

Like I'm sorry I completely understood the skepticism around the EA model but it has been over 12 years at this point and the EA funding and development model has produced some of the most successful and beloved titles of the last decade.

Baldur's Gate 3 was in EA for 3 years before going on to be one of the most critically acclaimed RPGs of all time; Hades was in EA for just under 2 years and is the uncontested gold standard for hack & slash action roguelikes; Factorio was in EA for almost 5 years and has quietly walked its way into history selling 3.5 million copies since going live; Rimworld spent 5 years in EA; Subnautica was in EA for over 3 years, Dead Cells, PUBG, Valheim...

Like I could go on there are at least another dozen titles on this list that spent 2 or more years in EA and then went on to massive success can we please stop pretending it's some kind of shady scam GGG is pulling on us?

Please remind me when Jonathan said GGG expected Path of Dodge Roll to be in full release? Because another year and a half (at current iterative pace) wasn't it. Either he lied (I know, I know, "plans change"), or he's really bad at his job. =9[.]9=

"

Raycheetah#7060 написал:

"

Kerchunk#7797 написал:

"

Raycheetah#7060 написал:

Nine months since initial drop, version 0.3, no swords. Gonna be in "early access" for a LONG time. ='[.]'=

You don't have to use quotes. You can just say early access. That's what this is.

Like I'm sorry I completely understood the skepticism around the EA model but it has been over 12 years at this point and the EA funding and development model has produced some of the most successful and beloved titles of the last decade.

Baldur's Gate 3 was in EA for 3 years before going on to be one of the most critically acclaimed RPGs of all time; Hades was in EA for just under 2 years and is the uncontested gold standard for hack & slash action roguelikes; Factorio was in EA for almost 5 years and has quietly walked its way into history selling 3.5 million copies since going live; Rimworld spent 5 years in EA; Subnautica was in EA for over 3 years, Dead Cells, PUBG, Valheim...

Like I could go on there are at least another dozen titles on this list that spent 2 or more years in EA and then went on to massive success can we please stop pretending it's some kind of shady scam GGG is pulling on us?

Please remind me when Jonathan said GGG expected Path of Dodge Roll to be in full release? Because another year and a half (at current iterative pace) wasn't it. Either he lied (I know, I know, "plans change"), or he's really bad at his job. =9[.]9=

who cares? can you play the game? yes? what more do you want?

"

Raycheetah#7060 написал:

"

Kerchunk#7797 написал:

"

Raycheetah#7060 написал:

Nine months since initial drop, version 0.3, no swords. Gonna be in "early access" for a LONG time. ='[.]'=

You don't have to use quotes. You can just say early access. That's what this is.

Like I'm sorry I completely understood the skepticism around the EA model but it has been over 12 years at this point and the EA funding and development model has produced some of the most successful and beloved titles of the last decade.

Baldur's Gate 3 was in EA for 3 years before going on to be one of the most critically acclaimed RPGs of all time; Hades was in EA for just under 2 years and is the uncontested gold standard for hack & slash action roguelikes; Factorio was in EA for almost 5 years and has quietly walked its way into history selling 3.5 million copies since going live; Rimworld spent 5 years in EA; Subnautica was in EA for over 3 years, Dead Cells, PUBG, Valheim...

Like I could go on there are at least another dozen titles on this list that spent 2 or more years in EA and then went on to massive success can we please stop pretending it's some kind of shady scam GGG is pulling on us?

Please remind me when Jonathan said GGG expected Path of Dodge Roll to be in full release? Because another year and a half (at current iterative pace) wasn't it. Either he lied (I know, I know, "plans change"), or he's really bad at his job. =9[.]9=

Why not both?

"

Raycheetah#7060 написал:

"

Kerchunk#7797 написал:

"

Raycheetah#7060 написал:

Nine months since initial drop, version 0.3, no swords. Gonna be in "early access" for a LONG time. ='[.]'=

You don't have to use quotes. You can just say early access. That's what this is.

Like I'm sorry I completely understood the skepticism around the EA model but it has been over 12 years at this point and the EA funding and development model has produced some of the most successful and beloved titles of the last decade.

Baldur's Gate 3 was in EA for 3 years before going on to be one of the most critically acclaimed RPGs of all time; Hades was in EA for just under 2 years and is the uncontested gold standard for hack & slash action roguelikes; Factorio was in EA for almost 5 years and has quietly walked its way into history selling 3.5 million copies since going live; Rimworld spent 5 years in EA; Subnautica was in EA for over 3 years, Dead Cells, PUBG, Valheim...

Like I could go on there are at least another dozen titles on this list that spent 2 or more years in EA and then went on to massive success can we please stop pretending it's some kind of shady scam GGG is pulling on us?

Please remind me when Jonathan said GGG expected Path of Dodge Roll to be in full release? Because another year and a half (at current iterative pace) wasn't it. Either he lied (I know, I know, "plans change"), or he's really bad at his job. =9[.]9=

why do you even care? sounds like you don't even like the game

"

Raycheetah#7060 написал:

Please remind me when Jonathan said GGG expected Path of Dodge Roll to be in full release? Because another year and a half (at current iterative pace) wasn't it.

Only after you remind me why that has anything to do with anything that has any impact on my life or my enjoyment of the game. Like, okay guy if you think Jonathan expected the game to be live sooner than it is going to be live then what am I supposed to do now? Quit playing the game? Call him names? What?

Snark aside you're just wrong anyway. Jonathan said he expected the EA to last at least six months.

You guys heard that and decided it meant six months, but "six months" and "at least six months" are two entirely different phrases with completely different meanings. "At least six months" means "the absolute minimum amount of time is six months but it could be longer" or more precisely "greater than or equal to six months."

The fact that EA is going to last longer than six months means he was right. "An amount of time longer than six months" is within the timeframe defined by "at least six months." I know that fact is going to upset you but it's just true.

Point of fact the real timeline he gave is "as long as needed." That's the language that has been on the Steam page since EA launched.