Join the First Path of Exile 2 Race Event
" +1 |
![]() |
" Any contest, any competition implies that the winner will be the one who does it better than others. Dissatisfaction formulated on the basis that this event is not interesting would be more understandable. At the same time, it is worth understanding that such events are useful for game development, since this forces you to study the mechanics, acts and find loopholes/vulnerabilities a little more meticulously. Unforeseen shortcuts, unplanned interactions, and so on. At least I was very pleased with the trend that players ran with different builds, because they have not yet come up with a single Cremation Templar setup like in POE 1. my hideouts - https://www.pathofexile.com/forum/view-thread/3228515
|
![]() |
" Nothing of that will be fixed. Because "works as intended" by default, and it is cheesy only in races. " Because no one really cared. A few of speedrunners came up with one and same build based on enough armor + shield charge / jump for skipping content. Would be much better if classes could use only their class skills. |
![]() |
" Any third party software can potentially get you banned. Read the TOS. Sometimes people get jammed up with these programs because they either dont use them correctly or they spam features, etc. It's better not to use anything but a loot filter imo. Buying Tattoos (Settlers) #3654153 ★ How To Itemize Beasts? #3559583 Unlock Sandwraith Map Device Kill Tracker #3461595 ★ Deli Music Off #3450767
Bestiary UI/Trading #3380585 ★ Upgrade Tabs to Quads Option #3452458 VISAGE GUILD RECRUITMENT - #3694978 ★ Forum Threads ★ |
![]() |
" GGG, are you okay? Is everything alright? Unfair advantage? Banning for breaching "terms of use"? Who wrote your terms of use?! You do realize that it's 2025 and people have been using multi monitor setups for decades now? In fact, YOU ALLOWED IT. You, GGG, allowed it. For many years. A decade, in fact. It's only been a few years since you REMOVED SUPPORT FOR SUPER ULTRAWIDE AND MULTI MONITOR SETUP. It is insane that in the past you let the super ultrawide/multi monitor people have fun in PoE1 for literally a decade with absolutely no issues, but then suddenly removed the option from PoE1 recently and still won't let people in PoE2. All the meanwhile you're claiming ridiculous nonsense like this and threaten to ban people for not obeying you. Out of touch to say the least. Almost nobody actually cares about this "competitive advantage" outside of your office. And banning people's accounts for getting a full experience with their multi monitor setup is straight up COOKED. You don't want people modifying the game files? Understandable. I have a perfect solution: RE-ENABLE MULTI MONITOR AND SUPER ULTRAWIDE SETUPS IN PATH OF EXILE 1 AND PATH OF EXILE 2. Re-add the native support that was literally baked into the game engine for a decade that you pointlessly removed. Then, nobody will have to modify the game files to play on their expensive setup, I know, pretty crazy, right? Последняя редакция: TheDravic#2646. Время: 3 марта 2025 г., 4:58:37
|
![]() |
event to practice for the new league, nothing more :D
|
![]() |
Hy guys, can someone please answear me if only one item was given per caracter? or are more winners?
|
![]() |
" one per class x3 runs 18 total |
![]() |
I loved watching all PoE 1 events as they were all super entertaining.
However, I could only watch about an hour of this PoE 2 'race'. Players moving slow, enemies in the way, no real movement skill which exacerbates the slowness, boring skills (albeit Perfect Strike looks awful but must feel great to play) and so on and so on. Feels like a different event could have been much more fun - lowest level to kill Geonor or something? Trudging through 3 acts with such slowness as a viewer was quite painful. Having said that I think this race wouldve been much more fun to participate in rather than watch. Youtube - PartTimeExile
www.youtube.com/@PartTimeExile "Remember, youre the best." |
![]() |
" Ye, that would be much better. Lowest level with fastest time. |
![]() |