'Legacy' items policy, re:patch 0.10.5

So because you dont have said item before ''nefr'' hits it you want everyone else to have it stats nefred... so later you can have the same thing hahahawow. you had enought time to grab it, ninja it, trade for it, whatever. Legacy items are not problem it only rewards collectioners.

That's an obvious explanation but given the fact how good/bad silverbranch is in the long run I would suspect the 'legacy items issue' is a bit deeper than you try to make it sound.

By legacy you guys mean unobtainable right?

"

wiggin написал:

"

Torguemada написал:

Maybe from the vocal minority, but thats all it is.

Nobody knows what do all the silent people think. This argument is often used as a last resort when disagreeing with many but holds a little value. Even devs clearly stated that legacy items are 'unfortunate' byproduct (of laziness, they even said there is a cure, just requires some work). We just want them to man up and do something about it.

I'm sorry but it's just a simple fact that this is really only an isssue to a small but focal minority crying about it in this topic, for the player base at large it's a non-issue.

"

Torguemada написал:

"

wiggin написал:

"

Torguemada написал:

Maybe from the vocal minority, but thats all it is.

Nobody knows what do all the silent people think. This argument is often used as a last resort when disagreeing with many but holds a little value. Even devs clearly stated that legacy items are 'unfortunate' byproduct (of laziness, they even said there is a cure, just requires some work). We just want them to man up and do something about it.

I'm sorry but it's just a simple fact that this is really only an isssue to a small but focal minority crying about it in this topic, for the player base at large it's a non-issue.

[citation needed]

---

"

ShaeG написал:

By legacy you guys mean unobtainable right?

Yes.

"

Torguemada написал:

I'm sorry but it's just a simple fact that this is really only an isssue to a small but focal minority crying about it in this topic, for the player base at large it's a non-issue.

The only relevant data we have are on forums unless you have done some research. Your statement is groundless. But even so, if the minority stating their opinion here is focal, it might be important to listen to them :)

"

pneuma написал:

[citation needed]

^

So much QQ.

I actually love the idea of museum pieces!
Can we have an indication if future tweaked items are different from the originals?

I guess my thinking is that the name "Silverbranch" means a certain thing, and if two different versions of it exist then then they should not both be called "Silverbranch."

I'm fine with them legacy-ing the old one as long as the new one has a different name. But if they are both going to be "Silverbranch" then they should both have the same stat ranges.

I don't understand what all the complaining is about?

Yes its a good leveling bow with Poison Arrow, pretty OP at the beginning. But the only benefits is the +2 to gem on the thing. I use it as a swap weapon until I can get a +3 bow which is obtainable early on, the rest of the stats don't really matter. I can understand if you're a ranger/ranged class trying to level, but even a +1 to psn arrow early on is OP.

The only people that I see might be mad are the "collectors" of garbage uniques, but if you want one that bad then hurry up and buy it. I doubt many people know its being nerfed.


Half the people that play this don't even bother using Poison Arrow to level new characters anyways, so stop all the whining. It's not like the +2 silverbranch becoming a legacy item is going to throw everyones game out of balance.

But the silverbranch in its current state is extremely unbalanced if someone gets it during a race. I'm pretty sure the +1 gem to psn arrow silverbranch is still going to be pretty OP in races, I'm just waiting for people to start crying about the new one.

"

wiggin написал:

But even so, if the minority stating their opinion here is focal, it might be important to listen to them :)

Listening to the vocal minority of people crying is what most often ruins good games.