So I wake up today and my account is locked with NO notice. You just lost a customer!

"
sempermalum написал:
Looking at your original account, you have no supporter packs and a whole 1 character over level 50, not sure you were much of a customer


Buuuurrrrnn!
"
idrankyourbeer написал:
this is like the most popular thread on the board this month lol good grief


What's not to love? It starts off petulant and goes downhill from there. We've even reached the point where posters are just red-carding logical fallacies and "well, actually..."-ing each other to death.

(I've been reading every post of the last page or two in the Simpsons' Comic Book Guy voice for added veritas)
Knowledge is power.
Power corrupts.
Stay stupid.
"
alhazred70 написал:
"
Turtledove написал:

Your analogy is morally reprehensible by most standards.


This assertion is nonesense. First off An analogy can't have moral weight its a hypothetical device to illustrate a logical premise. Then you use a vague appeal to authority fallacy "by most standards" that can't possibly be proven and would be an ad populum fallacy even if it could be supported.

Your stance on this issue is very obviously far from clearly thought out and seems mostly predicated on the distinction in your mind that its okay for someone to hold two opposing Hypocritical stances on an ethical matter; as long as they are applied in separate arbitrary geographical boundaries. Thus the analogy which unfortunately you've failed to grasp.

You might as well be arguing that it's okay for GGG to let people who wear Red shoes RMT; but at the same time Ban people who wear Blue shoes if they RMT. after all they have different colored shoes. Thats exactly how well thought out your premise is.


HAHAHA

This is marketing policy for a computer game. It is NOT an ethical matter! It is a marketing matter. You have gone off the deep end. Sorry.
Over 430 threads discussing labyrinth problems with over 1040 posters in support (thread # 1702621) Thank you all! GGG will implement a different method for ascension in PoE2. Retired!
This is a good troll post.
"
Turtledove написал:
"
alhazred70 написал:
"
Turtledove написал:

Your analogy is morally reprehensible by most standards.


This assertion is nonesense. First off An analogy can't have moral weight its a hypothetical device to illustrate a logical premise. Then you use a vague appeal to authority fallacy "by most standards" that can't possibly be proven and would be an ad populum fallacy even if it could be supported.

Your stance on this issue is very obviously far from clearly thought out and seems mostly predicated on the distinction in your mind that its okay for someone to hold two opposing Hypocritical stances on an ethical matter; as long as they are applied in separate arbitrary geographical boundaries. Thus the analogy which unfortunately you've failed to grasp.

You might as well be arguing that it's okay for GGG to let people who wear Red shoes RMT; but at the same time Ban people who wear Blue shoes if they RMT. after all they have different colored shoes. Thats exactly how well thought out your premise is.


HAHAHA

This is marketing policy for a computer game. It is NOT an ethical matter! It is a marketing matter. You have gone off the deep end. Sorry.


He has indeed. Difference is though, he can swim...
Carry on my waypoint son, there'll be peace when maps are done.
Lay your portal gem to rest, don't you die no more.

'Cause it's a bitter sweet symphony this league.
Try to make maps meet, you're a slave to the meta, then you leave.
Lost a customer... Pretty sure they acknowledged that before the ban hammer came down.

Пожаловаться на запись форума

Пожаловаться на учетную запись:

Тип жалобы

Дополнительная информация