Recent mass bans are wrongful and GGG needs to address this mistake and fix it.

"

Kerchunk#7797 написал:

"

TemjinGold#1898 написал:

Hence I don't see how this is any different.

I don't know guy, I would say the difference is that the economic impact isn't f'ing limited in this case but that's just going out on a very short limb.

But, let's just go ahead and agree that it says a lot about the strength of your claims if you're supporting it with an ad hoc comment made during an interview about pre-release footage of a different f'ing game from over ten years ago.

I'm sorry you cannot comprehend why what you said is grossly inaccurate. Are you claiming what holds in philosophy and principle for PoE1 won't hold for 2 even though it's the same exact studio?

How exactly is this "exploit" not limited? Do you even know how it works?

If the mods on the blue tablets were instead also spawned on the unique, is anyone who uses the unique now therefore banned? Because given that people had ALREADY been dropping cost to 0 prior, it's not like that activity was created after the release of the unique. GGG released this unique knowing full well people have already been dropping cost to 0. How exactly is this the player's fault?

I don't condone exploits and cheats. I couldn't care less what happens to the ill gotten gains. What I do care about is the concept of slippery slope. Because if this rationale for banning is fine, then what is next? If I juice a map too hard, that's a nono? If my build is too strong that's not good for the economy either? What if I accidentally drop 2 mirrors in a map? That would be pretty unsettling for the economy. Should I be banned for picking them up?

"

Kerchunk#7797 написал:

Oh my god dude give me a f'ing break. The absolute audacity to talk about intellectual dishonesty while trying to do the 500 semantic backflips necessary to claim that abusing an exploit that allowed for the creation of infinite currency isn't really abusing an exploit.

I did no such thing and tried to be straightforward. If you disagree with that, that's fine. But you're doing a good job at reflecting. Seem madder than I was at the beginning xD

@Kerchunk#7797
didnt GGG state it hardly affected the economy?
you see theres the grey area..."exploit"...was it really
is a bugged build also an exploit?
they certainly effect the economy. seems to me you avoided the question with some mental gymnastics

I find it hilarious the people here saying these players need to be banned are the same players who will remind you this is "Early Access".

Let me remind you guys this is Early Access and we're exploring the game, for GGG, and are helping in their QA process.

If GGG screws something up in Early Access, which you can argue has a higher likelihood than with the release of proper Leagues, they need to fix the issue and thank the players for finding their oversight.


You can't have your cake and eat it too.
Well you can, if you're eating crapcake.


P.S. I can't put in my own time in a game like this, with the risk of being banned for using a new item, and lack of integrity of the creators to realize they messed up, so please keep us updated if this ever gets resolved because I'm absolutely not playing until this is resolved. If you want to take their orbs or whatever they gained, okay, that makes sense, but banning them is just disgraceful.

"

tarloch#1873 написал:

@Kerchunk#7797
didnt GGG state it hardly affected the economy?

"Thankfully, the economic impact outside of the banned accounts is relatively small."

"

edgartheslayer#7880 написал:

not to mention there's only so much you can take with you with limited portals every time, to where after you've done some maps, you need to make the setup all over again, getting all the tablets with the randomized mods all over again etc.

Haven't played enough of Dawn of the Hunt to make it to the endgame yet, but....isn't this just not true?

0.2.0 Patch Notes: "You will be able to enter and exit your Maps as much as you like as long as you haven't died. The number of portals is representative of the number of revives you have during the Map."

What in place to stop someone to from getting this setup once, and using that map for 12+ hours?

"

edgartheslayer#7880 написал:

And I quote:
"There was no bug or unintended mechanic used. It's clear as day what these tablets do and say" 8:36
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qT6oJ3Bm3ek

I think this person was very transparent and explains the situation in detail very well. If you think he should be banned, then you need to ban me because I would've done the same thing, and I absolutely will in the future given the opportunity under the impression that this is either intended, or you didn't think through how strong this could be, which at that point is your fault, not the player's.
Just take the L and admit you were wrong, unban these people. When I saw another video of Ziz going through the patch notes, I didn't think much of it, but I'm glad this person brought this up and made a video about it explaining the situation in detail.

Shameful, GGG.

Sincerely.


Edit: I'm a bit tired replying to misinformed comments. Please actually watch the video.

They only banned people clearly abusing the problem...Not everyone that did the thing...People exploiting things should be banned, GGG banned them, good riddance to them...If you are in that pack, good riddance to you too until next league.

"

Jadian#0111 написал:

0.2.0 Patch Notes: "You will be able to enter and exit your Maps as much as you like as long as you haven't died. The number of portals is representative of the number of revives you have during the Map."

What in place to stop someone to from getting this setup once, and using that map for 12+ hours?

Wait what. I thought they were going to make portals to maps even more restrictive. You mean you can re-enter maps indefinitely now as long as you don't die?

If that's the case, that's awesome!
and that changes things regarding this topic. I guess it is infinite as long as you don't get a DC that crashes your map, so I retract that statement as an argument and apologize then.