Dear Rory

@Ephetat: I think the point with the changes is more about getting extra mana with enlighten, rather than putting the same auras that before. At least not without heavy investment (Not just wealth per se, you can argue all you want about how actually effective is as it is the changes). There are jewels out there that give new options for reservation, and if Rory words are right, new options to replace auras will exist in the future.

My bet is that Enlighten will be nerfed until no one feels like having it in every build.

Too many auras can be overpowered. Too much defense or too much offense are balance nightmare. It makes hard to give a challenge to every build without overtuning the content for the rest, so I guess they are trying to control the power creep with these changes.
Add a Forsaken Masters questline
https://www.pathofexile.com/forum/view-thread/2297942
"
Aim_Deep написал:


Yes you are wealth gating and breaking builds.

two of my builds. I'm not one to prioritize offense because I play with 160 ping and prolly a bad player anyways so I run defensive aura mainly so it's not a luxury like offensive aura.

One "jumpin_jack_slash" needs a lvl 6 enlighten to run same auras as before
grace and two purities.
Betahttps://poe.mikelat.com/beta/#EoHX/=0ZEtsc
Livehttps://poe.mikelat.com/#EoHX/g-z3usc

Another "she_blitz" now needs two lvl 4s again all defensive auras. Two purities, vitality, and clarity.
Beta https://poe.mikelat.com/beta/#yJv8iy/Ri8a9CY/6UlQQsh
Live https://poe.mikelat.com/#SRHDhy/SeEZ9CY/7QrMRsh

I guess second is not "broken" per se but cost went from 2ex (2 x lvl 20 RM)to 140EX ( 2 x lvl 4 enlighten) just to run.



That is my main fear about the aura nerf, it s about defensive builds. 2h have to play without shield it is already hard for them defensively. Same for your builds I guess.

I really hope all this new 2.0 path is not made all around dps/dps nerf while forgetting it could hurt defenses in the process.

"
NeroNoah написал:


Too many auras can be overpowered. Too much defense or too much offense are balance nightmare. It makes hard to give a challenge to every build without overtuning the content for the rest, so I guess they are trying to control the power creep with these changes.


But not everything should have challenge. I mean should level 78 mobs one shot level 100 toons? I would expect level 100 monsters doing that not 78 one.

The game is not made for level 90+ in mind so I don t get why they should be nerfed.

If they are still too strong after level 90 monsters are around ok but until then what is the point? the game is finished at level 80. Early game dps should be nerfed (normal/cruel) not the end-game defenses.
Forum pvp
https://www.instagram.com/critterspencils/
Последняя редакция: lolozori#1147. Время: 11 мая 2015 г., 15:01:07
"
justinmm1988 написал:
Im not impressed with fortify personally, ive watched a lot of streamers use it...and I sure don't see a difference in incoming dmg, maybe it's different when you're the one behind the keyboard idk...just going off what I see from streams.


Probably because they also buffed monster damage through the roof in beta. It definitely needs more work, with certain mod combos we were already fairly close to getting oneshot by heavy hitters.
Wish the armchair developers would go back to developing armchairs.

◄[www.moddb.com/mods/balancedux]►
◄[www.moddb.com/mods/one-vision1]►
"
NeroNoah написал:
@Ephetat: I think the point with the changes is more about getting extra mana with enlighten, rather than putting the same auras that before. At least not without heavy investment (Not just wealth per se, you can argue all you want about how actually effective is as it is the changes). There are jewels out there that give new options for reservation, and if Rory words are right, new options to replace auras will exist in the future.

My bet is that Enlighten will be nerfed until no one feels like having it in every build.


Yes, I agree that's how it should be -- it's just that what Rory said in the original dev manifesto post implied the exact opposite, which is why people went into "level 4 Enlighten" kneejerk mode in the first place. Obviously he's changed his line in this thread, and it all seems a little flimsy when the official line zig-zags this way.
Have you made a cool build using The Coming Calamity? Let me know!
"
TheAnuhart написал:
"
goetzjam написал:
"
Lordsidro написал:
People will always use the best option regardless. If it's RM then that if it's enlighten then that. 1 of those is available to everyone one is not. That being said I like the changes. But either enlightens too rare/wealth gated or the change isn't quite right.

Issue is trying to balance around early game. reducing aura cost and freeing up sockets but creating another wealth bubble for maps :/

Also it's a strict nerf to builds running 2x 60%s or in betas case 2x50%. in mid late game.


Or you know they could move some of the reduced mana that is missing from the gap of removing RM and changing enlighten to you know the quality of auras?

That keeps early game in check will offering a sink for GCPS for builds that really want to squeeze out that extra herald or aura.

I've actually made a post about it here:

https://www.pathofexile.com/forum/view-thread/1266122


That suggestion has to be the worst ever, honestly.

I've already pointed out Chris' views on aura quality in that he doesn't want it to benefit solo players. Now, he might have changed his views, maybe in the grand scheme of things, with many changes that have happened and more that are planned, maybe this is a possibility.

However, unless one of those changes is to allow GCPs to be used on corrupted gems, then no, aura reserve reduction via aura gem quality would be a suicide move.

How many people with lvl 21 0 quality auras in permanent leagues do you think would simply close the PoE client and move on, never to support GGG again?

GGG doesn't balance around permanent leagues, no. But they do have to balance the books, that's one sure way to shoot themselves in the knackers.


Rofl its not the worst you just want to shut down my idea.

You pointed out that what 2-3 years ago he didn't want quality auras to benefit players, at that same time they were fine with reduced mana....you see how things change? Hell they added heralds that are basically personalized auras that have quality bonus that benefits the player, so seeing that and comparing quality auras in the same light is just wrong.

They wouldn't need to allow for people to GCP there level 21 auras, people would have to redo their current ones and sell their old ones for less...not that big of a deal, definitely not as big of a deal as the purposed change that changes socket colors.

If people are going to close the game over level 21 0 quality auras with the change they shouldn't be playing the game to start with, if they have the wealth to play around it they can just run 1 less aura until they can purchase or level\gcp up more.

You are saying GGG shouldn't balance around perm leagues but only argue to why the idea is "terrible' because of perm leagues. Do you even read your post before hitting submit?

As it is slated now enlighten will change the gear you need for running the same auras because of the color change from red to blue. My change would just require re leveling auras and using some GCPs, instead of rebuying MIRRORED gear and getting level 4 enlightens.....

My idea is possible for people in temp leagues, especially if players want to pool resources into 1 (aka a support character) and doesn't make aura builds the .00001% but maybe .001% or whatever amount.

But its ok, its my idea and you have to shut it down with 0 arguments that are actually on the same logic with your "but standard people will quit" logic.
https://youtu.be/T9kygXtkh10?t=285

FeelsBadMan

Remove MF from POE, make juiced map the new MF.
I find it a little perplexing when people complain about "moving the goalposts" during a debate. If the new goalposts are the right ones, why complain about them moving in the past? If they aren't, why complain about them moving in the future?
When Stephen Colbert was killed by HYDRA's Project Insight in 2014, the comedy world lost a hero. Since his life model decoy isn't up to the task, please do not mistake my performance as political discussion. I'm just doing what Steve would have wanted.
Последняя редакция: ScrotieMcB#2697. Время: 11 мая 2015 г., 15:02:48
"
ephetat написал:
"
NeroNoah написал:
@Ephetat: I think the point with the changes is more about getting extra mana with enlighten, rather than putting the same auras that before. At least not without heavy investment (Not just wealth per se, you can argue all you want about how actually effective is as it is the changes). There are jewels out there that give new options for reservation, and if Rory words are right, new options to replace auras will exist in the future.

My bet is that Enlighten will be nerfed until no one feels like having it in every build.


Yes, I agree that's how it should be -- it's just that what Rory said in the original dev manifesto post implied the exact opposite, which is why people went into "level 4 Enlighten" kneejerk mode in the first place. Obviously he's changed his line in this thread, and it all seems a little flimsy when the official line zig-zags this way.


There was not a great consideration about if the gem is really needed or there are other options anyway. I don't know, the change was judged in a vacuum for me.

The lesson here is that wealth costs are felt different by people, and that build costs are always better, they are fair to everyone, :P

PS: This aura changes add a new drawback to builds that rely on Lightning Coil, isn't it? It could balance that unique (less best in slot, I guess).
Add a Forsaken Masters questline
https://www.pathofexile.com/forum/view-thread/2297942
Последняя редакция: NeroNoah#1010. Время: 11 мая 2015 г., 15:12:28
"
ScrotieMcB написал:
I find it a little perplexing when people complain about "moving the goalposts" during a debate. If the new goalposts are the right ones, why complain about them moving in the past? If they aren't, why complain about them moving in the future?


Hmm... tell me, Scrotie, have you ever licked a goalpost in the winter? Anyone?
Wish the armchair developers would go back to developing armchairs.

◄[www.moddb.com/mods/balancedux]►
◄[www.moddb.com/mods/one-vision1]►
"
lolozori написал:



That is my main fear about the aura nerf, it s about defensive builds. 2h have to play without shield it is already hard for them defensively. Same for your builds I guess.


Well fortify will help melee 2H attackers. But not my witch who uses a staff (caster). Either way change is breaking builds and wealth gating unless they change values of auras, enlighten or both.

In all fairness my CI witch actually gains mana and needs no RM/Enlighten due to disciplines low mana res cost in beta.

Seems like they are all over the place here. Scatological changes. Hopefully its just fine tuning and they wont break too much once game is live.
Git R Dun!
Последняя редакция: Aim_Deep#3474. Время: 11 мая 2015 г., 15:15:54
"
goetzjam написал:


Rofl its not the worst you just want to shut down my idea.

You pointed out that what 2-3 years ago he didn't want quality auras to benefit players, at that same time they were fine with reduced mana....you see how things change? Hell they added heralds that are basically personalized auras that have quality bonus that benefits the player, so seeing that and comparing quality auras in the same light is just wrong.

They wouldn't need to allow for people to GCP there level 21 auras, people would have to redo their current ones and sell their old ones for less...not that big of a deal, definitely not as big of a deal as the purposed change that changes socket colors.

If people are going to close the game over level 21 0 quality auras with the change they shouldn't be playing the game to start with, if they have the wealth to play around it they can just run 1 less aura until they can purchase or level\gcp up more.

You are saying GGG shouldn't balance around perm leagues but only argue to why the idea is "terrible' because of perm leagues. Do you even read your post before hitting submit?

As it is slated now enlighten will change the gear you need for running the same auras because of the color change from red to blue. My change would just require re leveling auras and using some GCPs, instead of rebuying MIRRORED gear and getting level 4 enlightens.....

My idea is possible for people in temp leagues, especially if players want to pool resources into 1 (aka a support character) and doesn't make aura builds the .00001% but maybe .001% or whatever amount.

But its ok, its my idea and you have to shut it down with 0 arguments that are actually on the same logic with your "but standard people will quit" logic.


I think the idea would have been great, pre SotV and corruptions. Now, no.

I'm not attempting to shut down your idea because it is yours, anyone could have suggested this and my replies would be the same.

I never said GGG shouldn't balance around permanent leagues, I said they don't. READ.

I don't have 0 arguments, I have 1 very solid argument that it would be a very bad decision for GGG to effectively shit on all non-quality corrupted auras.

I even said the idea is fine if they allow the use of GCPs on corrupted gems, if not, the idea is a massive shitstorm waiting to happen if implemented.

Try not taking things personal, for once? Look to the good of the game, the players and GGG rather than the usual counter productive knee jerk defence that does more harm than good.

Also, you seem pretty upset.

Stop complaining.
Casually casual.

Последняя редакция: TheAnuhart#4741. Время: 11 мая 2015 г., 15:22:41

Пожаловаться на запись форума

Пожаловаться на учетную запись:

Тип жалобы

Дополнительная информация