Dear Rory

"

666lol666 написал:

"

TheAnuhart написал:

In other words, there was no problem with EB.

There was a problem with fire prolif.

I really wonder why ggg is unable to see this. I mean everyone knows that prolif is 90% of the problem, everyone but ggg.

"

666lol666 написал:

I really wonder why ggg is unable to see this. I mean everyone knows that prolif is 90% of the problem, everyone but ggg.

"

raics написал:

"

666lol666 написал:

I really wonder why ggg is unable to see this. I mean everyone knows that prolif is 90% of the problem, everyone but ggg.

Especially considering the golden balance rule: "if you make a single target effect AoE you must give it some kind of penalty", and proliferation had none.

"

goetzjam написал:

"

raics написал:

"

666lol666 написал:

I really wonder why ggg is unable to see this. I mean everyone knows that prolif is 90% of the problem, everyone but ggg.

Especially considering the golden balance rule: "if you make a single target effect AoE you must give it some kind of penalty", and proliferation had none.

What people fail to realize is that having a penalty on prolif (damage that is) just means you want the initial hit to be much higher, forcing yet another build to be better as crit instead of just "chance to ignite" or non-crit.

"

raics написал:

What's so odd about that? It goes for pretty much every skill out there, if poison arrow had anything to gain by critting people would go crit with it.

Truth be told, I don't like the way it was implemented, one less support is already a damage penalty.
If it was me I'd put '30% less burning damage' and '50% reduced ignite/chill/freeze/shock duration'.

"

goetzjam написал:

Its not whats so odd its that people have QQ'd about crit being OP or just strait up better in almost every case, after this change it really is no different, in order to clear high level maps with flameblast prolif effectively you now need that higher damage threashold and after the removal of echo being used with flameblast you either stack super high castspeed and the rest or you go crit and 2, 3 or 4 stack and use fire pot to mitigate reflect.

"

raics написал:

"

goetzjam написал:

Its not whats so odd its that people have QQ'd about crit being OP or just strait up better in almost every case, after this change it really is no different, in order to clear high level maps with flameblast prolif effectively you now need that higher damage threashold and after the removal of echo being used with flameblast you either stack super high castspeed and the rest or you go crit and 2, 3 or 4 stack and use fire pot to mitigate reflect.

Which you most likely won't do because you can't run high level AA anymore and you will kill yourself on reflect sooner or later :)

"

melodia1 написал:

The only things this new patch will likely do:
- Make it 10x harder for new players or casual players to survive endgame when it's ALREADY very hard to survive some endgame maps, since it seems all the skilled being nerfed to nonexistence are the ones used by newer players concentrating more on survival/cheap gear reliance (GMP/LMP, totem, reduced mana, CWDT, etc) as well as making endgame monsters even harder than now. And of course there's no way they can afford 90 regrets for a complete respec and buying a completely new set of gear/gems since their original one completely got wrecked
- Make it 10x easier for those rich people who play 12 hours a day with 300 exalts sitting in their bank, because it seems the only skills buffed are the ones used by more experienced players, and for them to laugh when they'll be the only ones who can afford 90 regrets for a complete respec + a couple dozen exalts for a complete gear/gem change

GG GGG. For a completely f2p game you sure are trying your hardest to make this game as unfriendly to casual players as possible. Not sure what the motive is since nothing in the cash shop is p2w? I mean if this was a p2w game like Tera then it's perfectly normal for devs to make the game as difficult as possible for newcomers to milk cash out of them.